How AI search cites Linear
Linear scores 34/100 for AI search visibility. See how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude cite Linear when asked buying questions in its category — and what's holding it back.
Product development system for teams · linear.app
Dimension breakdown
Top issues
Live citation test
What this means for Linear
Linear scored 34/100 on GeoBench's 5-dimension AI visibility benchmark — placing it in the "Mostly invisible" band. The score reflects live queries against real LLMs (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude), not traditional search rankings.
Linear is mostly invisible to AI search today. Strong brand with humans does not equal citation share with LLMs. The gap is closable — the work is mostly content architecture and schema, not engineering.
This audit runs 3 buying-intent prompts. The full $49 report runs 25 prompts across 5 LLMs, auto-detects competitors, ranks every finding by impact, and ships a copy-paste schema kit tailored to linear.app.
Other audits
Audit your own site
Free, 15 seconds, no sign-up. See how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude cite your brand.
Run my free GEO audit →Audit snapshot generated 2026-05-15. AI citation behavior changes constantly — re-run anytime via the free audit.