How AI search cites Figma

Figma scores 57/100 for AI search visibility. See how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude cite Figma when asked buying questions in its category — and what's holding it back.

57
Losing citations

Collaborative design tool for teams · figma.com

Dimension breakdown

AI Citation Presence 33/35
Technical AI Readiness 8.5/20
Content Extractability 5.5/20
Authority & Trust 10/15
Freshness & Maintenance 0/10

Top issues

high
Homepage does not front-load the category answer
high
robots.txt blocks 4 AI crawlers
high
Schema.org coverage is thin

Live citation test

"What are the best collaborative design tools for remote teams?"
Figma: cited at position 1 Adobe XDMiroSketchInVisionCanva

What this means for Figma

Figma scored 57/100 on GeoBench's 5-dimension AI visibility benchmark — placing it in the "Losing citations" band. The score reflects live queries against real LLMs (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude), not traditional search rankings.

Figma is losing citation share to competitors. LLMs know the category but reach for other brands first. The fix is structural — front-loaded comparison content, FAQ schema, third-party review presence, and AI-crawler-friendly markup.

This audit runs 3 buying-intent prompts. The full $49 report runs 25 prompts across 5 LLMs, auto-detects competitors, ranks every finding by impact, and ships a copy-paste schema kit tailored to figma.com.

Other audits

Audit your own site

Free, 15 seconds, no sign-up. See how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude cite your brand.

Run my free GEO audit →

Audit snapshot generated 2026-05-15. AI citation behavior changes constantly — re-run anytime via the free audit.