How AI search cites Supabase

Supabase scores 47/100 for AI search visibility. See how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude cite Supabase when asked buying questions in its category — and what's holding it back.

47
Losing citations

Postgres development platform for applications · supabase.com

Dimension breakdown

AI Citation Presence 0/35
Technical AI Readiness 17/20
Content Extractability 10.5/20
Authority & Trust 10/15
Freshness & Maintenance 9/10

Top issues

high
Zero citations across 3 category prompts
medium
No FAQ section detected
medium
No /about page linked from homepage

Live citation test

"What are the best Postgres development platforms for web applications?"
Supabase: not cited HerokuDigitalOceanAWS RDSGoogle Cloud SQLElephantSQL

What this means for Supabase

Supabase scored 47/100 on GeoBench's 5-dimension AI visibility benchmark — placing it in the "Losing citations" band. The score reflects live queries against real LLMs (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude), not traditional search rankings.

Supabase is losing citation share to competitors. LLMs know the category but reach for other brands first. The fix is structural — front-loaded comparison content, FAQ schema, third-party review presence, and AI-crawler-friendly markup.

This audit runs 3 buying-intent prompts. The full $49 report runs 25 prompts across 5 LLMs, auto-detects competitors, ranks every finding by impact, and ships a copy-paste schema kit tailored to supabase.com.

Other audits

Audit your own site

Free, 15 seconds, no sign-up. See how ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude cite your brand.

Run my free GEO audit →

Audit snapshot generated 2026-06-13. AI citation behavior changes constantly — re-run anytime via the free audit.